EGPA – Kirkwall Airport

Tier B (estimated) · 42 movements in 2026 · NM-inferred milestones, no capture metrics

Coverage here is judged on estimated reference times. What can be said firmly is whether flights were seen at all: 86.4% of movements in 2026 are picked up. Across its departures, essentially none of the taxi-out reached the network: this aerodrome is invisible on the ground even though its flights are seen in the air. There is no arrival figure, so this page carries no coverage index.

period departures arrivals Departures seen (%) Arrivals seen (%) Coverage index
2026 22 20 86.4% 85.0%
2025 29 26 75.9% 80.8%
2024 29 28 86.2% 89.3%

Departures

off_s is good when negative – the track began before take-off.

Distribution of off_s. Zero is take-off.

When the track starts, relative to take-off (minutes)

period n p10 p50 p90
2026 19 +13.1 +16.4 +18.3
2025 22 +12.6 +14.9 +16.5
2024 25 +12.1 +14.0 +16.0
delta 2026-2025 +0.5 +1.6 +1.8

Arrivals

land_s is good when positive – the track ran on past landing.

Distribution of land_s. Zero is landing.

When the track ends, relative to landing (minutes)

period n p10 p50 p90
2026 17 -13.1 -8.9 -7.1
2025 21 -12.5 -9.6 -6.8
2024 25 -13.4 -10.0 -7.7
delta 2026-2025 -0.6 +0.8 -0.2

Where the coverage is

WarningNothing observed near the aerodrome

No position report was received from an aircraft on the ground here, or from one airborne below 1,500 ft, in any sampled period. There is no map to draw: aircraft only become visible once they are already well above the aerodrome.

The tier decides what can be measured.

Tier A (measured by APDF). The airport’s own records give the real times: off-block, take-off, landing, in-block. The taxi has exact bounds, so how much of it arrived is a measurement.

Tier B (estimated by NM). Network Manager gives an off-block time and a predicted taxi duration – an estimate, not a measured one. With no runway times, take-off is inferred, so only a median across a few hundred movements is worth reading.

There is no in-block time either, so nothing ends a taxi-in; NM’s arrival time is off-block plus predicted taxi plus predicted flight duration, adding nothing. Tier B therefore gets no arrival coverage, and the coverage index needs both sides.

The all-aerodromes table holds both, its taxi-out column filled throughout and asterisked where the window was measured.

Against the fleet

How this aerodrome compares with the aerodromes with estimated milestones. Typical aerodrome is the median across all of them. Rank is this aerodrome’s position among them, 0 (lowest) to 100 (highest).

measure this aerodrome typical aerodrome rank (0–100)
Departures seen (%) 86.4% 99.8% 9
Arrivals seen (%) 85.0% 99.7% 8
Track start vs take-off (min, median) +16.4 +1.0 89
Track end vs landing (min, median) -8.9 +4.0 16

Higher rank is better everywhere except track start vs take-off, where a low value is the good case.

Was each flight tracked as one flight?

A poor coverage number can mean the receivers heard nothing, or that the algorithm cut the flight’s track up. This separates them.

period One flight, one track (%) Split across tracks (%) Merged with another flight (%)
2026 departures 86.4% 0.0% 0.0%
2026 arrivals 85.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2025 departures 75.9% 0.0% 0.0%
2025 arrivals 80.8% 0.0% 0.0%
2024 departures 86.2% 0.0% 0.0%
2024 arrivals 89.3% 0.0% 0.0%

The underlying counts

Everything above is derived from these. Typical taxi times are context: the same 200 seconds of reception is most of a short taxi and a fraction of a long one.

period Departures Departures seen Arrivals Arrivals seen Unusable reference rows Typical taxi-out (min) Typical taxi-in (min)
2026 22 19 20 17 0 10.0
2025 29 22 26 21 0 10.0
2024 29 25 28 25 0 10.0

<- back to rankings